New World Order 2023 (eBook)

January 2023

Climate adhesives receive salary for actions

As one can see from a German daily newspaper, the protests, such as the soiling of art and sticking on the street, are sponsored by an American find. This means that young people are paid for their actions with a salary and social security contributions. This is handled by a German association. What one wants to achieve with this is very questionable. But since this financing comes from the USA, one wonders what the purpose of it is. What culture looks like in this state could already be seen in January 2021 with the storming of the Capitol. It is only to be seen again and again that the European Union allows itself to be led by this country. The background is already correct, in that something should be done about climate change, but such means are not necessarily effective. In America, one should pay much more attention to environmental pollution before financially supporting these actions, even if its president wants to invest an enormous amount of money against climate change. In my opinion, such disruptive actions are extremely questionable as far as the objective is concerned and should be punished rigorously, and not with a few hundred euros. This is about our identity, which we have painstakingly acquired over centuries and which are destroyed by such actions.

Corona imports from China

If you plan to check the wastewater from airplanes for corona infections in individual states, you can only agree with this approach. Finally, almost one in five people in this country is infected with this virus. But, as is always the case, there is once again chaos as far as agreement on such measures is concerned. We will have the virus all over the world again due to the rising numbers, only through such controls could the increase be contained somewhat. The only thing that is incomprehensible is the reaction on the part of China, which threatens to take countermeasures. It should also be in their interest to control this pandemic and not to respond to it with immediate reactions, but perhaps it is also due to the fact that the past restrictions had actually only achieved negative aspects.

Young people rioting against the state

How can it be that more and more young people are taking to the barricades against the state and its legal forms and democracy? It's true that we in the Western world live in countries where you can express your opinion openly, but the whole thing should also be within the realm of the rule of law. Attacks are being made on emergency services, works of art are being destroyed and the judiciary is watching. Have you once again "overslept" something in politics or the judiciary, or do you want to watch these excesses even longer. It is true that young people are showing us what is going wrong, but this should be within the legal framework. However, since the countermeasures are inadequate, with penalties that are too low, one should react to such tendencies of violence. If one also hears that a large part of the "rioters" has a migration background, migrants and refugees should also be discussed in this context. It is simply unacceptable that such people come to us and then wantonly damage our infrastructure and thus try to undermine the value of a democracy. For example, there are asylum seekers in our country who have already committed crimes and live from the country where they are staying and are not deported. Do we, as the Western world, have to put up with this?

Republicans and their democracy

North America praises itself as the greatest democracy and votes are held there like in a dictatorship. It was only after the 15th time that a speaker for the House of Representatives could be found. One wonders how far the influence of the former president still is. But as can be observed around the world, the form of government of democracy is no longer obsolete. It is much more meant by some people that only they hold the absolute truth and try to rigorously enforce these points of view, regardless of whether the sovereign has decided otherwise or not. Is that democracy then? Above all, it should be noted that such methods of exercising power can also be found in other countries. History has shown us time and again that power should emanate from the people and not necessarily from individuals who are only attached to their own ideas and, if necessary, want to implement them by radical means. What comes out of it is drastically demonstrated to us in Ukraine. There, even a despot enforces his abstruse ideas at the expense of the population by force of arms.

Brazil and civil war?

It's been almost exactly two years since the storming of the Capitol was in the USA and this has also set a precedent. When a president who has been voted out of office incites his supporters to storm democratic institutions, there are many parallels to America. A vote by the sovereign is just as unacceptable as Trump, for example, who also poured oil on the fire by saying that the election victory two years ago had been stolen from him. Former President Bolsonaro of Brazil apparently cannot come to terms with his defeat and is likely to mobilize the mob to enforce his intentions. Is such a thing still democracy, where you want to hold on to power through revolts? Only in contrast to his colleague in America, Bolsonaro has fled to the United States, probably to continue igniting from there. To what extent is the form of democracy affected when some people think that the only way to stay in power is by force?

Putin and the Orthodox Church

The fact that the head of this church stands by the ruler and his attitude to the special operation in Ukraine is one thing, but how do you interpret the wanton killing of tens of thousands of people in this belief? In Christianity there is a commandment that says, 'Thou shalt not kill.'" Whether Christianity has always adhered to it is, of course, questionable. But a ceasefire is declared for 36 hours on what is probably the biggest festival of the Orthodox Church, but neither of the two warring parties adheres to it. Russia continues to bomb briskly and understandably defends Ukraine. So why then such statements that don't help anyone. How far will this aggressor go to implement his dubious ideas? How many times have we, as a community of states, been so often deceived by this despot, and both warring parties are supposed to sit down at the same table and negotiate peace when agreements are then unilaterally broken by Russia?

Floods in California

How many more climate catastrophes does this planet have to experience before politicians finally react? Yes, the American president is putting together a package that is to invest about 400 billion dollars in the expansion and research of alternative energy production. But as we have always seen, this will certainly fail again due to some objections, especially since the European economy is not enthusiastic about such projects. But you can already see that a certain competition inspires again and again. If the mining of lignite is also discussed in Germany, this is counterproductive. What do we want to pass on to the next generations, such as a destroyed planet, or do we finally get going when it comes to climate protection? Individual lusts for power and money-making actions should be put on the back burner. As I said, it is no longer 5 to 12 o'clock, but much more we have already exceeded this time.

Politics and its plans

It is apparently no longer so easy for politicians and the respective decision-makers to make plans for the future. It is necessary to react again and again to the upcoming events and the projects are then put on the back burner. Did their predecessors miss a lot? For example, our government met for a New Year's discussion and the result was a bit meager. However, we as Austria are not alone in thinking of America, where the opposition repeatedly opposes bills. One might think that it would be in the interest of all politicians to act quickly and efficiently so that things get moving. Of course, a "war" like the one we had to experience last year could not be foreseen, but it should not come to the point that such a circumstance costs us a lot of time. If our government has then decided to focus on environmental protection and renewable energies in the coming year, that is commendable, but other countries should also vehemently follow these developments. The sovereign then judges with his vote the results of such plans of the politicians in the election.

Top secretion and how presidents deal with it

These are documents that serve to secure the state and should be treated as such. If a president and a vice-president make use of them, they have also been authorized to do so by a vote of the electorate. What should be criticized, however, is that these are also used outside of official offices and in the private sector. In other words, national security cannot be guaranteed in this way. If, for example, such papers appear in garages and private rooms, apparently anyone can access them and this should be prevented. In some areas, there is a strict ban on transporting papers from offices to private homes. Why doesn't this happen with presidents as well? After all, we are talking about documents that should not be accessible to everyone. What is also to be noted is that these were also found in a garage and not in living rooms. How did they get there? The difference is that the incumbent president is probably more cooperative than his predecessor when it comes to providing information.

Golden Piano in the People's Parliament – Parliament

Some...